What Is Foreign Policy Analysis?

What is a policy and when does a policy become foreign? This introductory chapter defines foreign policy analysis (FPA). At the crossroads between the theories of international relations and public policy analysis, FPA draws on multiple disciplines. Few fields of study have embraced disciplines as varied as sociology, economics, public administration, psychology and history with the same enthusiasm. Although there are now calls for interdisciplinarity in all the social sciences, FPA can, undeniably, claim to be a leader when it comes to integrating different disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Buy Now

eBook EUR 42.79 Price includes VAT (France)

Softcover Book EUR 52.74 Price includes VAT (France)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

References

• Alesina, A., and D. Dollar. 2000. Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1): 33–63. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Allison, G.T. 1969. Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. American Political Science Review 63 (3): 689–718. Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. 2008. The Policy Tools of Securitization: Information Exchange, EU Foreign and Interior Policies. Journal of Common Market Studies 46 (1): 75–100. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Buzan, B., O. Waever, and J. Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Google Scholar
• Criekemans, D. 2010. Foreign Policy and Diplomacy of the Belgium Regions: Flanders and Wallonia. Clingendael: Netherlands Institute of International Relations. https://www.Clingendael.nl/sites/default/files/20100300_cdsp_discussion_paper_in_diplomacy_criekemans.PDF. Google Scholar
• Dallek, R. 2003. An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917–1963. New York: Little Brown and Company. Google Scholar
• Depledge, J. 2008. Striving for no.: Saudi Arabia in the Climate Change Regime. Global Environmental Politics 8 (4): 9–35. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Drury, A.C., et al. 2010. Note from the Editors. Foreign Policy Analysis 6 (3): 187–190. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Fordham, B.O. 1998. Economic Interests, Party and Ideology in Early Cold War Era US Foreign Policy. International Organization 52 (2): 359–396. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• ———. 2011. Who Wants to Be a Major Power. Journal of Peace Research 48 (5): 587–603. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Frankel, J. 1963. The Making of Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Decision Making. London: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Friesendorf, C. 2016. Police Assistance did Foreign Policy: Explaining Donor Practices. Review of International Studies 42 (2): 377–400. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• George, A.L. 1980. Presidential Decision-making in Foreign Policy: The Effective Use of Information and Advice. Boulder: Westview. Google Scholar
• Gerner, D.J. 1991. Foreign Policy Analysis: Renaissance, Routine or Rubbish? In Political Science: Looking to the Future, ed. W. Crotty, 123–185. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar
• ———. 1995. The Evolution of the Study of Foreign Policy. In Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation, ed. L. Neack, J. Hey, and P. Haney, 17–32. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Hagan, J.D. 2001. Does Decision Making Matter? Systemic Assumptions vs. Historical Reality in IR Theory. International Studies Review 3 (2): 5–47. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Houghton, D.P. 2007. Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach. Foreign Policy Analysis 3 (1): 24–45. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Hudson, V. 2005. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis 1 (1): 1–30. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Hudson, V., and C.S. Vore. 1995. Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review 39 (2): 209–238. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Jordan, R., D. Maliniak, A. Oakes, S. Peterson and Mr. Tierney, eds. 2009. One Discipline or Many? TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculty in Ten Countries. The Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, February 2009. https://ai2-s2-pdfs.s3.amazonaws.com/61b7/8374a0e1d661bed930532233b58c6ea42d97.pdf.
• Kaarbo, J. 2003. Foreign Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century: Back to Comparison, Forward to Identity and Ideas. International Studies Review 5 (2): 156–163. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Keohane, R.O., and J. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown. Google Scholar
• Lake, A.B. 2011. Why Are Evil Isms: Theory, Epistemology and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress. International Studies Quarterly 55 (2): 465–480. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Legrand, V. 2009. Decision-Making in Foreign Policy and Geopolitical: The Jordan-Palestine-Israel Triangle and the Jordanian Decision of Disengagement in the West Bank. Brussels: Peter Lang. Google Scholar
• Lentner, H.H. 2006. Public Policy and Foreign Policy: differences, Intersections, Exchange. Review of Policy Research 23 (1): 169–181. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Light, M. 1994. Foreign Policy Analysis. In Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory, ed. A. Groom and M. Light, 93–108. London: Pinter. Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, H. 1948. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf. Google Scholar
• Neack, L., J. Hey P. Haney eds., 1995. Generational Change in Foreign Policy Analysis. In Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation, 1–15. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Neustadt, R.E. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Reiter, D. 1996. Crucible of Beliefs: Learning, Alliances and World Wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J.N. 1966. Pre-Theories and Theories of Foreign Policy. In The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, ed. J.N. Rosenau, 95–149. New York/London: Free Press. Google Scholar
• ———. 1968. Comparative Foreign Policy: Fad, Fantasy gold Field? International Studies Quarterly 12 (3): 296–329. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• ———. 1971. Toward the study of national-international linkages. In The scientific study of foreign policy, ed. J.N. Rosenau, 307–338. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
• ———. 1980. The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy. London: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Schafer, M. 2003. Science, Empiricism and Tolerance in the Study of Foreign Policy Making. International Studies Review 5 (2): 171–177. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Sheptycki, J.W.E. 2000. Issues in Transnational Policing. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Sil, R., and P.J. Katzenstein. 2010. Analytic Eclectism in the Study of World Politics. Perspectives on Politics 8 (2): 411–431. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Singer, D.J. 1961. The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations. World Politics 14 (1): 77–92. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Smith, S. 1986. Theories of Foreign Policy: An Historical Overview. Review of International Studies 12 (1): 13–29. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Snyder, R.C., H.W. Bruck, and B. Sapin. 2002 [1962]. Foreign Policy Decision Making. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Sprout, H., and M. Sprout. 1965. The Ecological Perspective on Human Affairs with Special Reference to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
• Stern, E. 2004. Contextualising and Critiquing the Poliheuristic Theory. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (1): 105–126. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Vengroff, R., and J. Rich. 2006. Foreign Policy by Other Means: Paradiplomacy and the Canadian Provinces. In Handbook of Canadian Foreign Policy, ed. P. James, N. Michaud, and M.J. O’Reilly, 105–130. Lanham: Lexington Books. Google Scholar
• Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. 1959. Man, the State and War. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
• White, B. 1999. The European Challenge to Foreign Policy Analysis. European Journal of International Relations 5 (1): 37–66. ArticleGoogle Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Political Science, Université Laval, QC, Canada Jean-Frédéric Morin & Jonathan Paquin

1. Jean-Frédéric Morin